The Challenges of Manual Matching
For many finance teams, manual matching is a daily routine. Documents often exist in different formats—as PDFs in an email inbox, on paper on a desk, or within a separate inventory management system. The reconciliation requires a high degree of concentration and time.
Even small discrepancies, such as different item numbers, quantity variations, or tiered pricing, can lead to lengthy internal inquiries. The consequences are not only significant time investment but also an increased risk of errors, like duplicate payments or paying incorrect amounts. This inefficiency blocks valuable employee capacity that is missing for strategically important tasks like cash flow management and budget planning.
Example 1: The Time Drain in E-Commerce
An e-commerce company south of Munich uses an SME ERP system for managing its physical goods and finway as its central finance operating system. For invoice approvals, the managing director opens finway and the ERP system on two separate monitors and manually validates every invoice against the corresponding delivery notes.
This process is not only extremely time-consuming but also carries a high risk of error. With hundreds of transactions per month, something can easily be overlooked, leading to financial losses and unnecessarily complicating the accounting process.